Your best source of information and news about Vista hardware, winvista and vista on the internet

August 16th, 2009

You are currently browsing the articles from MS Windows Vista Compatible Software written on August 16th, 2009.

GTK Themeing


My favorite feature of Ubuntu Jaunty (9.04)?

Dust is installed by default.

There has been lots of discussion on this in the Ubuntu community for a few releases now…I think Dust is a definite winner. There will never be any theme that will please every one, but I think Dust not only looks great now but will integrate into GNOME shell very nicely as well!

Just a random comment – now back to your regularly scheduled Blog reading.

Written by jaysonrowe on August 16th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on GNOME and otherSoftware and Ubuntu and Computing.

Hardware already exists for Windows Mobile 7?

csr-winmobile7

A tiny piece of silicon has caught the attention of my peripheral vision perhaps providing some clues to just how far Microsoft is in to the development of Windows Mobile 7, or from the glass is half full perspective – how close Windows Mobile 7 might be to market.

Cambridge Silicon Radio, a UK company that specializes in chips for mobile devices (who just merged with the world’s #1 supplier of GPS chips SiRF), announced mid-June the UniFi CSR6026/CSR6028 chip, a single-chip solution to deliver WiFi 802.11n support in mobile embedded devices such as smartphones. The most noteworthy of its specifications is a mention of “Windows Mobile 7″ in its list of supported operating systems, on top of “Windows Mobile 6.x, Windows CE 6.1 and 5, Linux v2.6, Android”.

Assuming the specification is accurate (and it’s hard to imagine it being a typo of Windows Mobile 6.5), it means either CSR engineers are in possession of an operational time machine or that the kernel or hardware interface layer of Windows Mobile 7 have already been finalized by Microsoft. I’ll let you decide which one is more plausible.

student-wm7

On a related note, a student newspaper at the University of Waterloo interviews student Naheed Hirji who worked at Microsoft during winter break on Windows Mobile 7. Whilst Naheed appears extremely well trained by the Microsoft public relations folks on disclosure, he confirms WM7 is to be released in 2010 and reveals “the aim of Windows Mobile 7 is to be a hybrid between business and consumer oriented phones”. Right, whatever that’s suppose to mean. You win this round ambiguous marketing speak!


Written by Long Zheng on August 16th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on otherSoftware and blog.

Content Management Systems

Apart from the ISO images of four FOSS distributions in this month’s DVD, we have also managed to pack in some of the best content management systems (CMS). We hope you deploy and test them all. Well, if you really do, let us know your feedback on them, or write a comparison article if you have the time :-)

Drupal is a FOSS modular framework and CMS written in PHP. It is used as a back-end system for many different types of websites, ranging from small personal blogs to large corporate and political sites. The standard release of Drupal, known as “Drupal core”, contains basic features common to most CMSs. These include the ability to register and maintain individual user accounts, administration menus, RSS-feeds, customizable layout, flexible account privileges, logging, a blogging system, an Internet forum, and options to create a classic brochure-ware website or an interactive community website.

Joomla CMS enables you to build websites and powerful online applications. Many aspects, including its ease-of-use and extensibility, have made Joomla the most popular website software available. Best of all, Joomla is an open source solution that is freely available to everyone.

WebGUI is a platform for managing all your Web-based content and applications. WebGUI is modular, powerful, secure, and user-friendly. Most users find themselves managing content within hours, and developers can easily plug-in functionality to maximise a site’s potential. It is an easy to use content management system, which has ability to create and install custom applications. With WebGUI, you can publish articles, participate in forums, create photo galleries and can even create interactive event calendars.

WordPress is a state-of-the-art Web publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, Web standards, and usability. It’s arguably the de-facto blogging platform.

TYPO3 is a free and open source content management system written in PHP. TYPO3 offers full flexibility and extendibility while featuring an accomplished set of readymade interfaces, functions and modules. The system is based on templates. People can choose an existing template and change features such as logo, colours, and fonts, or they can construct their own templates using a configuration language called TypoScript.

Mambo ( formerly named Mambo Open Source or MOS) is a free software/open source content management system (CMS) for creating and managing websites through a simple Web interface. It has attracted many users due to its ease of use. Mambo includes advanced features such as page caching to improve performance on busy sites, advanced templating techniques, and a fairly robust API. It can provide RSS feeds and automate many tasks, including web indexing of static pages.

e107 is a content management system written in PHP and using the popular open source MySQL database system for content storage. It’s completely free, totally customizable and in constant development.

XOOPS is an extensible, object oriented, easy to use dynamic Web CMS written in PHP. XOOPS is an ideal tool for developing small to large dynamic community websites, intra company portals, corporate portals, blogs and much more.

Plone is a free and open source CMS built on top of the Zope application server. It is suited for an internal website or may be used as a server on the Internet, playing such roles as a document publishing system and group ware collaboration tool. Plone is designed to be extensible.

OpenCms is a professional, easy-to-use website CMS. The fully browser-based user interface features configurable editors for structured content with well-defined fields. Alternatively, content can be created using an integrated WYSIWYG editor similar to well known office applications. A sophisticated template engine enforces a site-wide corporate layout and W3C standard compliance for all content.

Moodle is a Learning Management System (LMS). It is a free Web application that educators can use to create effective online learning sites. It’s open source licence and modular design means that people can develop additional functionality.

Source of Information : Linux For You May 2009

Written by magakos on August 16th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on otherSoftware and software.

Debian and Ubuntu: Can’t we just get along?


Let’s face it. Ubuntu is based on Debian – each new release of Ubuntu draws packages in from Debian’s Unstable branch, polishes those packages and with the wave of a few thousand magic wands, a new Ubuntu version is born.

Ok, ok – there is more too it than that, but it is true that although technically no longer “compatible” with each other, Ubuntu is based on Debian, and does to a certain extend depends on Debian for it’s mere existence.

You would think that these two projects (both being Linux distributions) would have the same end goal in mind, which would be to offer a free, and open PC Operating System to end users. However, with some discussions I’ve been reading lately I wonder if that is really the case, at least in regards to Debian. I’m really confused by the attitudes and beliefs of some of the Debian developers. I know of two separate occasions where members of Ubuntu’s leadership, first Ubuntu Community Manager Jono Bacon, and most recently Ubuntu and Canonical founder Mark Shuttleworth have reached out to the Debian community offering help in having the two distro’s work together to achieve a common goal of providing quality free software to the end user.

Although Mark’s attempt is probably too recent to really “call” either successful or unsuccessful, but judging by some of the comments being made, it hasn’t exactly been met with open arms by the Debian community. Some in the Debian community see Ubuntu as a “leech” that takes and doesn’t give back. Ubuntu does give back! It gives back upstream, and it also gives in a big way that Debian never has and that is by exposing the mass public to free and open software. Ubuntu got Linux installed on PC’s being sold by what is probably the largest PC Manufacturer in existence (Dell). Not only did Dell start the Ubuntu line back in 2007, it’s kept it going since! Also, Dell recently commented that they hadn’t seen any of the “rumored” high returns of Linux netbooks, hinting that the entire Linux line has been successful.

I guess what I’m getting at is that it seems that Debian developers are creating a free and open Operating System for themselves, and could care less about a “stupid user”, while Ubuntu is more concerned with the end user experience, and is committed to providing the best that the Open Source world has to offer in a nice, stable easy to use package. Although there are only small fundamental differences between Ubuntu and Debian on the technical level, there is a *huge* difference in the public “opinion” of the two projects. For example, Linux creator Linus Torvalds himself has admitted himself in an interview that he’d never tried Debian, stating (and I quote):

So the only major distribution I’ve never used has actually been Debian, exactly because that has traditionally been harder to install. Which sounds kind of strange, since Debian is also considered to be the “hard-core technical” distribution, but that’s literally exactly what I personally do not want in a distro. I’ll take the nice ones with simple installers etc, because to me, that’s the whole and only point of using a distribution in the first place.

So the creator of Linux itself has never tried your distro because it’s believed to be so “technical”. If he has that opinion of Debian how do you think the guy just wanting to try Linux out for the first time would feel? Why would you not want to work with an easy to use distro such as Ubuntu that was created from the ground up to be a competitive, user-friendly OS?

I just don’t get it.
Flame suit on – fire away!

Written by jaysonrowe on August 16th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on Debian and otherSoftware and Ubuntu and Computing.