當他們可能選擇了XP， 「…它使我難過買新的計算機的認為所有輕率人跑窗口景色。 作為先生。 T喜歡說在80年代， I哀憐傻瓜。 讓我確切，我的點仅是關於選擇在XP和景色之間并且與橡皮防水布或Linux無關，許多獻身者感覺這個方式關於所有窗口用戶。 我這裡也不将保衛Windows XP，缺點是許多。 我的點簡單地是，如果您買一臺新的計算機跑窗口應用， XP是正確的選擇; 景色是錯誤選擇」。 讀充分的文章在C|網絡新聞.

想要一個便宜，強有力的選擇對Micrsoft辦公室為您新的Mac ？ OpenOSX發布了OpenOSX辦公室v2.0，地精辦公室的Mac OS x等值為Linux系統。 所有地精辦公室的應用在他們之中一起被包， AbiWord， Gnumeric報表和嵌心挾辮帶圖像處理機。 再版是當地的到英特爾和PowerPC (新和老)橡皮防水布，但最重要介紹Gnucash，跟蹤accouns、股票、收入和費用的一個財政節目。 更多信息. [通過MacNN]

So how is Vista’s real world usage doing? According to W3Counter - An internet traffic monitoring site, the operating system has only picked up 3% of the market and lags far behind XP. See the chart.

“…Seven states are pushing back against the Department of Justice’s assessment that the landmark antitrust settlement between the United States and Microsoft has removed the anticompetitive obstacles created by the software maker and resulted in more competition in the middleware market. In fact, according to attorneys for California, Connecticut, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, the commonwealth of Massachusetts and the District of Columbia, known as the “California Group” of plaintiffs, “Microsoft’s market power remains undiminished and … key provisions of the final judgment-those relating to middleware- have had little or no competitively significant impact.” Read the full article.

“…Paul Venezia bamboozled me into buying a MacBook Pro back in January, and I’ve been using it semi-daily ever since. And yeah, overall, I’ve been pretty happy. Of course, the only reason I was willing to buy one at all was because Parallels made it so easy to run Windows. But while my initial usage ratio was 85% Parallels, 15% OS X, over the past six months, that’s changed dramatically to 45% Parallels, 55% OS X. Yup, the Orchard does slowly assimilate you.” Read the full article.

…She managed to find Google, run a search for Firefox, and click on all the right link to make the download happen. But Vista won’t let her install it, popping up an alert that it’s not digitally signed by Microsoft.

Signed by Microsoft?

As has been noted, that’s not security. It’s business terrorism — frightening the user in order to protect Microsoft’s business interests. Read more.