ÀÌ ÁÖ Forrester ¿¬±¸ ºÐ¼®°¡ Å丶½º Mendel´Â â ºñ½ºÅ¸ ±×µéÀÇ ¹èÄ¡¸¦ ÀçÆÇ¸íÇϰí â 7À» ±â´Ù¸®´Â °ÍÀ» °í·ÁÇØ¾ß ÇѤ¤´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ºñ½ºÅ¸°¡ ±â¾÷¿¡¼ "°ÅÀýµÈ" ¿ä±¸ÇÏ°í ±×ÀÇ °í°´¿¡°Ô °ÇÀÇÇϴ âÀ» Àú º¸°í¸¦ °£ÇàÇß´Ù. ´ç¿¬ÇÑ ÀÏ·Î, À̰ÍÀº ±â¾÷ °í°´ÀÇ ¿ì¸®, ¿ì¸®ÀÇ ¼ö¹é¸¸, ¹× ¼º°¡½Å Åë°èÀÇ ³¹´ÜÀÌ µ¿ÀÇÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â ¹«¾ð°¡ÀÌ´Ù.
Heck, even Forrester doesn't agree with Forrester! Let me explain:
First, this report doesn't reflect the normal enterprise OS adoption cycle. Enterprise adoption of OSes has always been much slower than consumer adoption. After all, upgrading the PC in your living room is easy, but upgrading an entire front and back end infrastructure to thousands of users without downtime is much more complex, and that takes time. Computerworld contributing author (and Microsoft partner) David Feng just wrote an article about this, too. Mendel's report, however, simply skims over this common knowledge.
What is even more puzzling is that Mr. Mendel's report directly contradicts another Forrester report titled, "Building the Business Case for Windows Vista," which was written by fellow analyst Ben Gray. This report outlines the five main reasons why enterprises should start their company's migration
...