Rewrite Windows - Yes or No?重寫Windows版本-是或否？

"The best solution to the multiple woes of Windows is starting over. Completely. Now. “最好的解決辦法，以多重困境的Windows是開始。完全，現在。

Vista Vista的 is the equivalent, at a minimum, of Windows version 12--preceded by 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.1, NT, 95, NT 4.0, 98, 2000, ME, and XP. 是當量，在最低限度， Windows版本12 -之前， 1 .0， 2 .0， 3 .0， 3 .1，新台幣， 9 5， N T4 .0中， 9 8， 2 000， M e和X P中。 After 6 years of development, the longest interval between versions in the previous 22-year history of Windows, and long enough to permit Apple to bring out three new versions of Mac OS X, Vista was introduced to consumers in January 2007." 經過6年的發展，之間的間隔時間最長的版本，在過去的22年歷史的Windows ，和足夠長的許可證蘋果帶出三個新版本的Mac OS X ， Vista是向消費者介紹了在2007年1月“ 。

Read the entire article閱讀整篇文章 here 這裡

My Take: 我採取：

I am sorry, but there is a lot of misinformation and bias in this article.我很抱歉，但有很大的誤導和偏見在這方面的文章。 Mac OS X's heritage upon which it is built is even older than NT itself. Mac OS X的遺產後，它的建成是老年人，甚至超過新台幣本身。 Development on NT started in late '89 when Microsoft hired Dave Cutler, so NT is probably one of the youngest Microkernels next to Linux which was developed around '91 by Torvald.發展對新台幣年底開始的'89時，微軟聘請了戴夫卡特勒，因此新台幣可能是其中最年輕的microkernels明年到Linux這是發達國家靠近'91由torvald 。 There is also confusion between the code bases, Windows NT is completely different from Windows 9x/3x/1x.也有混亂之間的代碼基地，在Windows NT是完全不同的從Windows 9x/3x/1x 。 The only similarities they shared were version names and API's for those legacy applications you speak of.唯一的相似之處，他們共同被版本名稱和API的那些遺留下來的應用程式可言。 Microsoft does not need to rewrite Windows, they can clean it up, just like they did for example with the release of Windows XP Professional x64 where they removed things like AppleTalk, POSIX compliance and NetBEUI.微軟並不需要重寫的Windows ，他們可以清潔它，就像他們做，例如與釋放於Windows XP Professional x64的地方，他們拆除的東西，一樣的AppleTalk ，符合POSIX標準和NetBEUI 。 You must remember just like Linux or Unix, NT was designed in mind to be a portable OS, in fact during its development it was specifically targeted at different platforms such as PowerPC, Alpha, MIPs, the Intel processor it targeted had to be emulated.你必須記住，就像的Linux或Unix ， NT的設計，考慮到是一個便攜式操作系統，事實上，在其發展，這是專門針對不同的平台，如PowerPC的， Alpha的， Mips的， Intel處理器，它的目標不得不加以仿效。 So I would revise your analysis before dooming Windows.因此，我將修改您的分析之前， dooming窗口。 A lot of the work over years has been targeted at componentising much of Windows where vital components like the Network Stack, graphics don't create lots of dependencies.很多工作多年來一直針對componentising大部分Windows其中重要的組成部分一樣，網絡協議棧，圖形不創造大量的相依性。 Rumors are much of the built apps for instance will be optional in Windows 7.謠言很多內置的應用程序，例如將可選在Windows 7 。 Vista's only regret is, it made necessary architectural changes for the sake of security and took a long time to reach market, but out of it all, there were great benefits that developers still haven't managed to dig deep into like the new graphics and communication capabilities. Vista的唯一感到遺憾的是，它做了必要的建築的變化，為求安全和花了很長時間才達到的市場，而是出於這一切，有極大的好處，發展商仍沒有管理，以深入探討，如新的圖形和通信能力。 As for supporting legacy applications, Microsoft could even move compatibility to a virtualized stack where old apps work normally on newer versions of Windows without a hitch.至於支持原有的應用程序，微軟甚至可以移動的兼容性，虛擬堆疊如舊的應用程序正常工作，對較新版本的Windows沒有順利。 Nothing is wrong with the NT kernel and its age is not a problem either.什麼是錯的，與NT內核和其年齡不是一個問題。