祝賀是為了我們的好朋友Kristan M。 Kenney (當前 現在窗口)在最有價值球員任命最近圓被做了最新的微軟視窗轟擊或用戶最有價值球員。

對窗口景色社區的Kristan Kenney的貢獻開始，在景色beta節目甚而開始了之前和它總是時間問題在這個任命之前發生了。 從天4074對RTM和現在SP1， Kris是在發現把戲最前方并且亂砍做窗口景色更加令人愉快的經驗。 有希望地我們可以盼望更加(和更加巨大的)貢獻在將來來自Kris。

祝賀， Kris，您該當它!

網2.0是關於分享材料。 沒有需要重覆比它已經說。 但為許多「網那裡2.0 ″站點或服務，分享真正地是他們的唯一的事。 例如，當您真正地不 得到 任何通過上裝錄影對Metacafe或YouTube -您 份額. 但 Scribd網2.0 「起動」 (它有一陣子那裡現在…) 為分享文本比那是更多。 當您張貼內容對Scribd時，您在交換傾向於有益於。

當您上裝一個文件到接受幾乎所有普遍的格式像OpenOffice、Microsoft Word、PDF， PowerPoint和更多)的Scribd (它自動地被轉換成.doc、.pdf和.txt -，并且它來以轉換對音頻MP3版本。 但最重要-它為您的讀者是更大量方便的。

當您在您的blog時能埋置自已被主持的錄影，并且有它流出了對您的讀者與一點對沒有努力，線型和所有，它在崗位或文章更大量被複雜化(寧可，不可能)埋置一個二進制編碼文本文件。 與Scribd，您能立即埋置像這樣的一個文件：

…

Open source is supposed to be a way of simplifying licensing issues and sharing your software/music/video/other content with the masses — freely and magnanimously. Problem is, what happens when something open source is found to be a (possible) violation of some else’s rights? What happens to its derivatives? Do they just pack up shop and find something else, or are they legally responsible for their actions? In what seems poised to become a landmark case on this issue, we’re about to find out.

A Texan family is now suing Virgin Mobile for using a photo of their daughter, Alison Chang, in an ad campaign – the catch is, it was released by the photographer on Flickr under the Creative Commons Attribution license, and that’s where Virgin Mobile got the photo from. The problem is, the girl featured in the photo had no idea her photo was being used – or that it was released under the Creative Commons license.

As the case currently stands, the Changs are suing consumers of open source works and not the original party responsible for the release of the work as an open source material without a proper media consent form.

…