Il Gigabyte P35-DQ6. Cartolina base più-popolare del Gigabyte nella storia recente e possibilmente la cartolina base migliore-vendente del duo di nucleo 2 di Intel attualmente sul mercato. Overclocks bene, esso è in conformità al preventivo per un pc di prestazioni, ha tonnellate di opzioni ed è scuderia abbastanza maledetta. È inoltre sul bordo di un richiamo del prodotto?

Nelle due settimane scorse, il GA P35-DQ6 - abbastanza letteralmente - sta sparendo fuori delle mensole sia in linea che fuori linea. I rivenditori in linea popolari della parte del calcolatore gradiscono Newegg, ZipZoomFly, TigerDirect, Hanno frittoe Amazon - tutti di chi hanno trasportato questo bordo alto-riuscito un mese fa - più non lo hanno in azione.

Che cosa è ancora più bizzarro (più spaventoso, persino) è che alcuni depositi come NewEgg e ZipZoomFly manterrebbero una certa specie dell'annotazione out-of-stock degli articoli. La pagina ancora sarebbe là, un tasto dell'ordine inevaso sarebbe presente e ci sarebbe certa forma dell'indicazione o dell'altra che il prodotto, per lo meno, persino esistito ad un certo momento… ma per un certo motivo dispari, non.

…

La fonte aperta è supposta per essere un senso di facilitazione delle edizioni autorizzanti e di compartecipazione il vostro software/musica/video/altro soddisfare con le masse - liberamente e magnanimously. Il problema è, che cosa accade quando qualche cosa di fonte aperta è trovato essere la violazione (possibile) di a di alcuni diritti altri? Che cosa accade ai relativi derivati? Giusto imballano sul negozio e trovano il qualcos'altro, o sono legalmente responsabili delle loro azioni? In che cosa sembra sospesa trasformarsi in in una cassa del limite su questa edizione, stiamo circa per scoprire.

Una famiglia di Texan ora sta citando Mobile del Virgin per usando una foto della loro figlia, Alison Chang, in una campagna di annuncio - il fermo è, esso è stato liberato dal photographer sopra Flickr sotto Attribuzione creativa dei terreni comunali autorizzi e quello è da dove il Mobile del Virgin ha ottenuto la foto. The problem is, the girl featured in the photo had no idea her photo was being used – or that it was released under the Creative Commons license.

As the case currently stands, the Changs are suing consumers of open source works and not the original party responsible for the release of the work as an open source material without a proper media consent form.

…

VeriChip, maker of implantable RFID-powered identification microchips, are being accused of withholding information from the public with regards to the dark side of their “lifesaving” chips. Don’t say you haven’t been warned: the signs have been there for a decade, available for all to see. No, you needn’t be a doctor, radiologist, or nano-technician to have seen them and heeded their warning, you just had to watch a couple of episodes of one of the 90s most popular hit TV shows ever: The X-Files.

Apparently Chris Carter’s insanely-popular X-Files (and its cult following) had more than just the plot lines down right, it seems that The Truth really is out there after all! A startling article on on MSNBC today reveals that implanted “medical” microchips used for the purpose of the identification of cats, dogs, horses, and the elderly really can cause cancer after all, just like their TV counterparts.

For those of you not yet enlightened by Chris Carter’s science-ficitional work of art, here’s the gist of what happened (which is, by no means whatsoever, to be considered a substitute to actually watching the X-Files!). In the X-Files TV series, FBI Special Agent Dana Scully (played by Gillian Anderson) was kidnapped by “aliens” who had a unique identification microchip implanted in the base of her neck. Seasons later, Agent Scully discovers the microchip and has it removed, triggering a malignant nasopharengeal tumor to develop (in her nasal cavity). Later on in the storyline, Agent Scully’s cancer is healed by finding a replacement microchip (and we later discover that the microchip can cure cancer and most other bodily illnesses).

…

The United States Department of Justice. Dedicated to enforcing the law and defend the interests of the United States. Especially when Corporate America is at stake. Why else would the DoJ not only allow a biased and wholly non-neutral, two-tier internet, but also encourage the creation of a status-based online status/priority queue.

We’re not going to waste any more breath (or keystrokes, they do run out you know!) on begging people to see otherwise but rather get right to the point and list the real reasons why a two-tier internet is a very bad thing.

…

It’s probably very safe to say that Microsoft’s two upcoming service packs are the most eagerly-awaited products due to ship out of Microsoft’s camp anytime soon, at least as far as most end-users are concerned..

Windows XP SP3 has been through the (rumor) mill for a couple of years of now, with enough fake leaks and “this-is-what-it’s-going-to-be” downloads plaguing the net for quite a long time. Most people looking forward to Windows XP SP3 are hoping to get that last bit of performance boost and maybe a reliability update or two - and to resolve a couple of outstanding issues that have been patched but never officially released; addressing some software issues, chronic bugs, and hidden nasties. But, for the most part, Windows XP SP3 is intended to wrap those hundreds of patches, hotfixes, and security releases that have been released since Windows XP SP2 first made it’s (much-welcomed) presence known on August 6th, 2004.

Windows Vista SP1, though, is - without a doubt - what’s on everyone’s minds today. Ever since the fiasco (a.k.a. Vista RTM) that was pre-maturely (yet after much delay) released on November 8th, 2006; Windows Vista has been plagued with endless issues from terrible hibernation support, FireWire issues, HD-Audio problems, unexpected crashes and reboots, incredibly slow I/O and LAN activity, buggy UAC, and a lot, lot more.

…

It’s official, Jimmy Wales has gone too far. The founder of Wikipedia is famous for tapping into users to generate content and traffic, building the internet’s largest chain/web of user-generated content and information. From the million+ articles written by users to the billions of incoming links that have given Wikipedia its super-human search result rankings, Wales has clearly mastered the art of human exploitation more than anyone ever has.

Most people are content with things the way they are: after all, it’s for a good cause! Go ahead and exploit humans, we agree, if the end result brings as much benefit and knowledge to the world as Wikipedia did and does. However, earlier this year, Wikipedia did a couple of things that created an outrage in the online community, by banning contributing sources to Wikipedia from getting the credit they deserve.

Now Wales is at it again, this time though, it’s not the greater good that’ll be benefiting: Jimmy Wales is now using end-users to bring in the cash!

…