今天我向求助 CEH v5检查， EC理事会certification# 312-50我会有一阵子学习为它。 它太有不少于150个问题-和相当坚韧那些-，但我设法通过它(是考虑美国法律的OK的85%是Qs的一部分)。

我可以真正地推荐您向这检查求助-它是somethin花花公子! 问题短和确切(多项选择)，但 过程 去有非常凉快和有趣。 个人我下载了很多鬼的工具和指南，用虚拟机创造了一个被隔绝的网络并且测试了，测试，测试。 它是我可以告诉您-的乐趣我不可能似乎停止学习这种材料!

我在旅途也读了2本书：
-迈克尔Gregg ： 被证明的道德黑客检查Prep (非常好)
-金伯利坟墓： 官员被证明的道德黑客回顾指南(非常摘要)

如果您是已经一个完全凉快(和白色)黑客花花公子，您可能只大概向后者求助(它将给您什么的整体想法这检查是

默认情况下， ：设置特选UI自动地查出地方化的特选并且显示地方化的设置。 但，如果您是工作在定做的黑客缺省设置，这可以是非常缠扰不清的。 这个小的引伸“固定”缺省行为显示地方化的.properties文件的镀铬物URI。

与Firefox 2一起使用- > 2.0.0.* (更多…)

设置, 缺省行为, 缺省设置, Firefox, 黑客, 互联网, 地方化, 特选, ui, uri, 网

Hey,

I get this question a lot: how can we block U3 devices on the network?

Well, one approach that some companies take is to simply block the physical USB ports by glue etc. - no USB devices are able to get in, so we have a “secure” system… Hmmm, this would mean that we are not able to use other USB devices either - maybe not the best solution for all of us then…

If you have Windows Vista deployed the new Device Control functionality, but most companies have Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 products in production (and probably waits for Vista Service Pack 1 before they go ahead with the Vista deployment)… So, what could they do then?

Third party software, like GFI EndPointSecurity is capable of blocking USB devices etc. - and it’s does a very good job too, but there’s also a free way to do it (if you ask me it’s the best way to do it): implement Software Restriction Policies (SRP)!

I’ve been writing about the “Default Deny All Applications” approach and this is (of couse) also capable of blocking U3 devices - out…