Upgrading ASP.NET 1.x to ASP.NET 2.0 asp.net 1.x升级到asp.net 2.0
Last time, I speak in Hong Kong .NET UserGroup Monthly Gathering in 2007 Sept right after MSDN Seminar, the topic was “Experience Sharing: Upgrading ASP.NET 1.x –> 2.0 –> AJAX”.最后一次,我发言在香港。净usergroup每月聚会在2007年9月后的MSDN研讨会,主题是“分享经验:提升asp.net 1.x -> ” 2 .0- >“ A j ax”的。 Well, I also promised that i will blog about it.那么,我也承诺,我将博客约。 Actually, it is nothing new and it is nothing special.其实,它只不过是新的,这是没有什么特别。 I just shared my experience on how I upgrade ASP.NET 1.1 to 2.0 and how to enable AJAX.我只是分享我的经验,就如何在我升级asp.net 1.1至2.0 ,以及如何使阿贾克斯。
First, I am not sure if you know that, in .NET framework 2.0, there is 2 types of Web Projects, ASP.NET 2.0 Web Site and ASP.NET 2.0 Web Application.首先,我不知道如果您知道,在。 NET Framework 2.0的,有二类型的Web项目, asp.net 2.0网站和asp.net 2.0 Web应用程序。 You may refer to the following link for more information if you would like to read more.您可参考以下链接的更多信息,如果您想阅读更多资讯。
Introduction to Web Application Projects 介绍Web应用程序项目
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/Aa730880(VS.80).aspx http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa730880 ( vs.80 )的。 aspx
If you are going to upgrading your existing ASP.NET 1.x project, you should choose to be using ASP.NET 2.0 Web Application project.如果你要升级您现有的asp.net 1.x项目,您应该选择要使用asp.net 2.0 Web应用程序项目。 This is the message from one of ScottGu’s blog, Tutorial on VB and C# are also mentioned.这是信息从一个scottgu的博客,补习VB和C #中也提到了。
“Because the VS 2005 Web Application Project model has the same conceptual semantics as the VS 2003 Web Project Model, it also makes migrating VS 2003 web projects very, very easy – with zero/minimal code changes “因为与2005年的Web应用程序项目模型具有相同概念的语义,作为与2003年Web项目模型,它也使迁移与2003年Web项目非常,非常容易â € ”零/最小代码更改
…
Click to continue reading "Upgrading ASP.NET 1.x to ASP.NET 2.0"点击继续读“升级asp.net 1.x到asp.net 2.0 ”
Written by kenlin@HK [MVP] on 写kenlin @港元[ MVP方案]对 October 30th, 2007 2007年10月30日 with 带有 no comments 没有评论 . 。
Read more articles on 阅读更多的文章 Introductions 简介 and 和 .NET Framework 。 NET框架 and 和 Visual Studio 的Visual Studio . 。















