First things first: My Canon EOS 5 and then 3 never fell apart on any hike. But then I hadn’t walked 160 miles with either in one go, but they proved to be tough cameras. So the Leica’s first outing on a hike through Surrey and Kent in South East England for 2 weeks around my neck covering at least 130 miles up and down on the trail and 30 miles to and from pubs, accommodation and around towns would give it a gruelling challenge.

The result was the M2 holding up perfectly apart from one screw going walkabout somewhere in Rochester probably.

It had always been loose, the one on the right on the top plate, it was loose probably due to the camera shop not tightening it properly – I should get it sorted, and will, but not having my M2 for even so much as an hour is a daunting thought! Otherwise the camera kept soldiering on, come wind, rain and an awful lot of shine. The beauty of a manual camera is there is no electronics for water to foul although you wouldn’t necessarily want to drench the M2 in a downpour as I’m sure it wouldn’t do much good in the long run.

The lenses were a slightly different ball game. First the Voigtlander Ultron, held up magnificently until day 11 of 14 when I noticed the back screw thread plate was working itself free. I can forgive it as it had a lot of stress and that would work screws free to an extent, this had the effect of getting the focussing helical (?) off kilter so that at infinity it was focussing beyond infinity if that makes sense. Also the focussing was slipping with the rangefinder coupling becoming uncoupled as the lens shifted a few tenths of an inch from its usual position. I assumed this meant adjustment under warranty but was advised by Robert White it would be a 4 week turnaround time, so I have tried adjusting it myself and will run a test roll and see whether it is indeed now OK.

My ‘new’ 50mm Canon Serenar (a gem of 1950s optical design, 50mm f/1.8 and pretty flare resistant and excellent colour rendition) managed to end up in two bits The front part which contains all the optics unscrewed from the rear part which is the barrel and rear screw mount. Screwing it back together tightly solved the problem. (It hadn’t been done when I received it and I had no idea how to adjust it as it has no externally visible screws, so it took it to fall apart for me to realise how its held together!)

Overall, I shot 13 rolls of Kodachrome, 1 roll of EBX and the camera did a grand job. Leica sent a replacement screw to me for free (which was unexpected!) so the M2 is visually all 100% again. That said, I found the elastoplast I had taped over the hole made a comfortable thumb rest, might keep it on!

That said, the Leica just kept on going. Just what I expect from a camera. They have tough lives with me, but they’re like working dogs – they appreciate it that way.

Oskar Barnack, the man behind the original Leica camera designed the system to use 35mm movie film because of his asthma. A smaller lighter camera gave him the opportunity to walk and take photos which erstwhile equipment prevented due to its large size — 35mm was and is a miniature format. Yet today super-zooms and cameras including my own EOS 3 whilst undoubtedly robust, it is a big camera and does not make for long journeys on foot in my book. I have done it and for me I found the camera was not getting used because of its weight at the end of the day. You can read more about that in a previous blog post.

Having bought the M2, the plan was not so much to replace the EOS 3 but to have a smaller, lighter camera to use on occassion on walks. The reverse has happened, the M2 is fast becoming the only camera I use. From walks to pub gatherings and taking the odd silly snap down a night club, the M2 has become a a fantastic camera.
This is a short blog post of why I think this and perhaps this might work to your advantage.

Today is a good case in point, I woke up at 3:45am (early I know but sunrise shots do require early shots) and in the event wasn’t overly enamoured with taking my EOS 3, neither a tripiod or indeed taking the Mamiya. I just felt like taking it easy today, and thankfully with a smaller camera like the Leica M2 with a small set of replaceable lenses you have a lightweight, very robust system that can be flexible as well.

On arriving to the starting point Burton Mill Pond it took a while for the light levels to increase before I could start shooting (I was starting with Tri-X at box speed) but this didn’t bother me too much as shortly with the ease of holding the camera pretty steady at 1/15th (which is at least a stop or even two-stops slower than I can hold with an SLR with a 35mm focal length lens) it soon became apparent that not having the tripod wasn’t a hinderance. (I was shooting at f/5.6 with infinity ever so slightly out of focus, to emphasise the morning mist)

The other bonus with a small camera is that you can get into nooks and crannies and places where I find it hard to hold a camera securely or steadily. One of the best cameras for this is possibly the Olympus XA which has a decent fast 35mm (f/2.8) although the rangefinder patch is quite faint on many of them now as they have aged and they’re not quite as durable as the mechanisms in say a Leica or indeed the new rangefinders from Voigtlander or Zeiss (Cosina basically.)

Maybe some day you should give it a try, go out with a smaller camera: a decent digital compact, or a nice simple film compact, or maybe even dip your toes into a rangefinder system if you like the feel of it. It’s perhaps not for everyone, but the simplicity of the M2 is where I find my creativity is growing because I’m not worrying about meter settings, exposure compensation dials, auto-focus methods and so forth. Don’t get me wrong, the EOS 3 is a fantastic camera, but more often than not, I’m finding the M2 to be a much more favourable companion. The EOS 3 has definitely become pretty much my telephoto camera.

Continued from Part Two

In Use

Prices

• Leica M2 - £300
• Leica MR Meter -  £30
• Voigtlander Color Skopar 35mm f/2.5 - £120
• Voigtlander LTM to M Mount adapter (35mm) - £40
• Camera and Meter from MXV, Uckfield – www.mxv.co.uk
• Voigtlander LTM-M Mount adapter, Robert White – www.robertwhite.co.uk

Most reviews of a Leica usually pour over the specifications, the actual piece of equipment itself. However, any camera is in effect a light tight box which controls the amount of light that comes in and goes on to expose the film or sensor behind it. A Leica is no different in this effect. If you put a 50mm lens on an automatic every bells and whistle SLR (e.g. a Canon EOS 3 or Nikon F6) and a 50mm lens on the Leica, put it in the field and shoot away, the majority of people will see little to no difference if the aperture and shutter speed; as well as the subject are the same. Like any camera, the Leica by itself does not take better pictures. Owning a Leica will not make you a better photographer by default of owning it. What it will do is avail opportunities that some cameras don’t open up, where the nature of a camera like a Leica is best suited.

A good example might be three people at a gig, a low light situation. The person with the 5 x 4 camera is not going to get far with sheets of film, so it’s not ideal in that situation. The next person is armed with a modern SLR, with auto focus. The positives for them are the ability to shoot in rapid succession a number of frames to capture the action. The down sides could be the mirror slap’s noise disrupting the atmosphere (not least the person next to you) and the auto focus mechanism giving up leaving you to manual focus which without a split prism could be a tricky feat at wide apertures. The third person has a coupled rangefinder, with a decent fast lens they should be able to focus accurately most of the time (particularly with wider angle lenses) and shoot in relatively rapid succession to capture the moment in hand.

At no point does this define that one of those cameras is better in all situations, for that situation, a quiet rangefinder has its positives. In another situation such as serious landscape work, a 5×4 view camera may well have the distinct advantage over the other two. Thus there should be no mistaking a Leica by itself is not a better camera because it’s a Leica. Rather it becomes a better camera, in the right hands and in optimal situations – and this applies to types of camera rather than brands per se.

So here’s a tip: your photos lack any purpose and meaning? I can almost guarantee that moving to a Leica all by itself won’t make you a better photographer instantly.

As a very quick review of the features side, the most important thing to point out is that by itself, the M3 versus M2 does not equate the M3 as being better because its designation is higher. They are both excellent cameras on a par and for most people the main difference is the frame lines. The M3 comes if as shipped with frame lines for 50mm, 90mm and 135mm lenses, whereas the M2 comes with 35mm, 50mm and 90mm – which I find infinitely more useful. Others I am sure can point out all the other differences but in a practical sense that is it. It is just important to clear up a quick misunderstanding that the M2 in some way is a lesser sibling to the M3.

Other features include shutter speeds from bulb to 1/1000th of a second, a manually reset frame counter, a frame line preview lever, a fully coupled rangefinder built in and on some M2s (not mine) a self timer. As you can see, there really isn’t much to talk about except to say that what features it has are well made and feel very sturdy. Apart from the self timer which some M2s do not have, the other difference might be the rewind mechanism. All M2s have the ‘old fashioned’ rewind knob opposed to a crank, which slows down the speed at which you can rewind the film once fully exposed; the difference comes in how this rewind mechanism is engaged. Some M2s have a little lever/switch much like other M’s, whilst some have a button that varies in itself. One type of button has to be pushed in and held in whilst rewinding and the second type only needs pushing in once but can then be released to rewind. In my case my M2 came with the lever/switch.

Ok now that slightly tedious part is out of the way let’s move on to the usage of the Leica M2. First up is loading film which whilst widely mocked by some, is not as difficult as some make out. The basic process involves taking off the base plate and the spool, feeding the leader on to the spool, loading the cartridge back into the camera, aligning the sprocket holes on the advance spindle and moving the advance lever forwards a little to pull the film taught. Pop back on the base plate and fire off two frames over the exposed piece of film and off you go. The process probably takes no more than a minute. Much longer than my EOS 3 that takes a matter of seconds.

The beauty of the Leica really comes down to being smaller and lighter than most SLRs, the fact you can change the lenses unlike a lot of compacts (such as the Olympus XA which whilst small, light and very quiet has a fixed 35mm f/2.8 lens, no bad thing in itself) and that it is quieter.

I have been using the Leica M2 with the Leica MR Meter, which helps a little with getting accurate exposures (the M2 is a meter-less body) especially indoors but outside you can generally rely on Sunny 16 once you have a good eye for light and the basic principles of exposure. There is another advantage to the MR meter, it has a nice large knurled shutter speed dial which couples with the M2’s otherwise quite small shutter speed dial. The latter is my biggest annoyance as it can be a little fiddly otherwise (compared to a Bessa, Zeiss Ikon ZI and a more modern Leica M.)

Being a meter-less body, some could fairly rightly point out that they may struggle to get the action, but if you shooting print film, you will have good exposure latitude of 2-3 stops in most cases so you can afford to get the shutter speed a little off. If however you are using the Leica where it excels and that would be street work, documentary (not fast moving e.g. Formula 1 racing!), portraiture and still life/landscape you shouldn’t need to worry about firing off tens of frames in quick succession. In the instances noted above, one light reading will suffice for much of your work until the time of day changes (in general.)

For shooting landscapes, the Leica has fulfilled all that it needed to by being lighter than my SLR, and coupled with the Colour Skopar 35mm f/2.5 lens I have received sharp and pleasing results. In terms of indoor based work say family events, the lighter weight of the M2 has allowed me to shoot perfectly sharp pictures down to 1/15th second which would have resulted in disappointing pictures on the EOS 3 in most cases. Perhaps the clearest sign that the M2 is working out is that overall I thoroughly enjoy using the Leica as a camera but most of all the pictures I have got from it are as reliably enjoyable as those I get from the EOS 3. The last thing I would want is for the standard of my pictures to go down.

My next purchase will be probably a 90mm lens for portraiture work alone for situations where I don’t want to poke an EOS 3 with my 70-200mm f/4L in someone’s face!

Of course there is only so much one can write about a camera and I feel that I have exhausted this one. There is no denying that using a smaller, more simple camera is enjoyable to me but this is not the case for everybody, some people want fully automatic everything cameras but that takes a certain amount of the enjoyment out of the process for me – but again some people will be happy enough with that.

There are a few foibles with the M2 and perhaps M system in general. The shutter speed dial is somewhat small when the MR meter is not attached as already noted. Also, the very lower right corner of the 35mm frame is slightly obscured by my Colour Skopar lens barrel. With a faster lens this would be even more the case. This however would be a complaint for many rangefinders. It takes a while to get used to the ergonomics (what exists of them) of the M cameras, they don’t fit as neatly into the hands to start with as the new R series Bessa cameras, or many modern SLRs. After a while you soon find a comfortable hold of the camera and that complaint passes out of the window. However these are minor annoyances.

So the ultimate result – is it any good for what it was purchased for: taking pictures. It is certainly discrete, so much so that for a lot of people it looks like nothing more than a compact camera and is not taken too seriously. This is actually a positive as people tend to relax more than they do when my EOS 3 is pointed at them. Immediately the assumption for the EOS 3 in my case is that it is a ‘professional’ camera therefore you must be composed and so forth. With the Leica candid work is much easier and the intimacy of the outcomes is apparent. Outdoors for landscapes, the results are just as pleasing as using my EOS 3. The main difference is on the EOS 3 I tended to use the spot meter almost exclusively to pick out the mid-tone in a landscape, instead I now use the MR meter or the Sunny 16 rule (and a combination of both.) The results have been great and that is what counts.

In summary, the Leica M2 is a well made light tight box. It is a pleasure to use and some will often cite that it doesn’t matter about the equipment and that the picture is king. This is largely true but you have to use equipment that you get along with and some pleasure does come from this. An M2 or a Leica in general is not a magic bullet, it’s certainly not perfect for everything but if the need is for a small, light and quiet camera with an interchangeable lens system – a Leica M can be perfect for that. In my case I was lucky to find one for £300 (approximately US $450 in December 200 and that is very much an affordable camera.

For further discussion about the Leicas and rangefinders in general, I recommend the excellent www.RangeFinderForum.com website which not only has plenty of active discussion to ask any questions; but also an excellent archive of thorough answers to previously asked common questions too.

Example photos to follow soon.