Your best source of information and news about xp, hardware and xp on the internet

Vista ARTICLES TOP 50 Spyware Virus Vista SOFT Vista HELP

Linux

You are currently browsing the articles from MS Windows Vista Compatible Software matching the category Linux.

WHAT’S NEW IN KERNEL DEVELOPMENT

An effort to change the license on a piece of code hit a wall recently. Mathieu Desnoyers wanted to migrate from the GPL to the LGPL on some userspace RCU code. Read-Copy Update is a way for the kernel to define the elements of a data object, without other running code seeing the object in the process of formation. Mathieu’s userspace version provides the same service for user programs. Unfortunately, even aside from the usual issue of needing permission from all contributors to change the license of their contribution, it turns out that IBM owns the patent to some of the RCU code concepts, and it has licensed the patent for use only in GPLed software. So, without permission from IBM, Mathieu can get permission from all the contributors he wants and still be stuck with the GPL.

Loadlin is back in active development! The venerable tool boots Linux from a directory tree in a DOS partition, so all of us DOS users can experiment with this new-fangled Linux thing. To help us with that, Samuel Thibault has released Loadlin version 1.6d and has taken over from Hans Lerman as official maintainer of the code. The new version works with the latest Linux kernels and can load up to a 200MB bzImage. He’s also migrated development into a mercurial repository. (Although not as popular as git with kernel developers, mercurial does seem to have a loyal following, and there’s even a book available at hgbook.red-bean.com.) After seven years of sleep, here’s hoping Loadlin has a glorious new youth, with lots of new features and fun. It loads Linux from DOS! How cool is that?

Hirofumi Ogawa has written a driver for Microsoft’s exFAT filesystem, for use with large removable Flash drives. The driver is read-only, based on reverse-engineering the filesystem on disk. There doesn’t seem to be immediate plans to add write support, but that could change in a twinkling, if a developer with one of those drives takes an interest in the project. Hirofumi has said he may not have time to continue work on the driver himself. Meanwhile, Boaz Harross has updated the exofs filesystem. Exofs supports Object Storage Devices (OSDs), a type of drive that implements normal block device semantics, while at the same time providing access to data in the form of objects defined within other objects. This higher-level view of data makes it easier to implement fine-grained data management and security. Boaz’s updates include some ext2 fixes that still apply to the exofs codebase, as exofs originally was an ext2 fork. He also abandoned the IBM API in favor of supporting the open-osd API instead. Adrian McMenamin has posted a driver for the VMUFAT filesystem, the SEGA Dreamcast filesystem running on the Dreamcast visual memory unit. Using his driver, he was able to manage data directly on the Dreamcast. At the moment, the driver code does seem to have some bugs, and other problems were pointed out by various people. Adrian has been inspired to do a more intense rewrite of the code, which he intends to submit a bit later than he’d first anticipated. A new source of controversy has emerged in Linux kernel development. With the advent of pocket devices that are intended to power down when not in use, or at least go into some kind of power-saving state, the whole idea of suspending to disk and suspending to RAM has become more complicated. It’s not obvious whether the kernel or userspace should be concerned with analyzing the sleep-worthiness of the various parts of the system, or how much the responsibility should be shared between them. There seems to be many opinions, all of which rest on everyone’s idea of what is appropriate as well as on what is feasible. The kernel is supposed to control all hardware, but the X Window System controls hardware and is not part of the kernel. So, clearly, exceptions exist to any general principles that might be involved. Ultimately, if no obvious delineation of responsibility emerges, it’s possible folks may start working on competing ideas, like what happened initially with software suspend itself.

Source of Information : Linux Journal Issue 182 June 2009

Written by magakos on August 17th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on otherSoftware and Linux.

Wow! a great place for linux howto…


This website is provide a great knowledge with most popular linux distributions within the  most common topics.  There will have many step-by-step guideline for IT professional or beginner to do the linux server installation.

howtoforceHope you can take the most advantage of  linux for today technology and share it together…

Go now

Posted in Linux Tagged: Linux, PC Tips, website

Written by Myhouse on August 10th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on PC Tips and otherSoftware and Website and Linux.

Summer ‘09 Distro Round-up:


I’ve pretty much taken a break from Linux for quite a few months now. I did dabble around in Fedora a bit around April, but outside of that I was either playing w/ the iMac I owned briefly or one of the pre-release Windows 7 builds. When  I decided to sell the aforementioned iMac, I decided to purchase a notebook, and I picked a Lenovo Y530 which also turned out to be quite an awesomely compatible Linux machine when tested w/ a Live USB, so I decided to make it my “Linux Box”. But what distro to run? I liked Fedora when I tested out the pre-release builds, but did I like it well enough to live w/ it as a full-time OS? I used to be a die-hard KDE user, but I switched to GNOME around the time of the KDE 4 release – was KDE 4 ready to win be back? These were questions I had to answer. Anyway, here are a few brief “non-review” reviews of a handful of distro’s on my specific machine.

KDE vs. GNOME:

Sorry – I didn’t get around to really testing KDE 4 this time around like I wanted. I did create a Fedora 11 KDE Live USB and I have played around on it a little, as well as a KDE 4.3 Live CD from openSUSE. I think KDE 4 *is* getting “better”, but I think I’m pretty much set in concrete as a GNOME user from now on.

Distros:

Fedora 11:

Fedora actually wound up being the “winner”, and I’m going to do a separate post on Fedora 11, and how I have it set up, but here are a few of the reasons I ended up picking Fedora:

* All of my hardware works
* Large, friendly community
* Rooted in Enterprise Linux (anything I learn in Fedora can be applied to RHEL/CentOS/SL)
* It’s not Debian or Ubuntu (Means nothing other than I can learn a “different” way of doing things)

That’s all I’m gonna hit on for Fedora – I’ll save the rest for the dedicated Fedora 11 post.

PC-BSD:
Wanted to try – never could get the ISO to download – gave up. PC-BSD guys – you should work on getting more mirrors and/or Torrent seeds out there!

Debian Testing/Sid:
Never could get Testing or Sid to install using the businesscard.iso for the testing distro, which is usually how I set these up. Regardless of whatever mirror I would choose, or regardless of if I chose Testing or Unstable, the install would fail at some point during the “Base Install” stage. I’m assuming it’s just where the cycle is at in dev. at the moment. I tried to install Lenny & upgrade, but like Ubuntu Hardy (8.04) I think Lenny is just too old for my hardware as I couldn’t get X to work.

OpenSolaris 2009.06:
This is an interesting OS. I’ll be honest, I never intended on staying with this when I installed it, and I knew I was just playing around from the beginning, but honestly, I *think* I *might* could live with OpenSolaris long term IF I wanted to devote the time to learn a new Operating System, because this isn’t Linux by a long shot :-) Everything did seem to work ok out of the box, and I even got VirtualBox set up and working. Some things I noticed – ZFS LOVES it some RAM – used up almost my entire 4GB of RAM almost instantly, but I guess that’s a good thing since unused RAM is wasted RAM, however the machine got slower, not faster, and seemed to be swapping. Also this has to be the S-L-O-W-E-S-T booting Operating system I’ve ever used!

OpenSUSE 11.1:
I like openSUSE – I like their GNOME implementation, if for no other reason than it’s “different”. They do a great job with making KDE 4 almost usable, and the OS is always stable. However, as much as I “should” like openSUSE, I’ve never been able to get it running stable for more than a couple of days on any machine I’ve ever tried to run it on. I don’t know where the problem lies, but I simply don’t get along with it somehow. I think I end up trying to over-tweak it since it has a butt-load of services and stuff turned on by default, and it is surely the most bloated of the mainstream distro’s. In short, I like it, they have a great community, and it may be a great distro for you – it’s just not for me. Do be sure and check out Suse Studio though – it’s the coolest thing since sliced bread and Velveeta cheese :-)

Ubuntu 9.04:
Man…I don’t even know where to start with this one. It was the last distro I tested, mainly becuase I had the preconcieved notion of it working the “best” and had planned to stay with. I used Ubuntu full time from 5.10 until 7.04 – as of 7.10, things started going downhill for me, and I wonder just what is going on. The community is beyond huge, the distro has come closer to becoming a Mainstream OS than any other Linux distro has (Dell, etc.) yet it seems to get WORSE with every release. Even the “LTS” 8.04 was an utter disaster for many people. Is it a situation where there are simply too many cooks in the kitchen? Is the distro just too big with too many packages and too many volunteers? Is Ubuntu just riding a wave of success and as a whole lost some of it’s drive to take things to the “next level”? I mean they have been talking about a new theme for over a year – since 8.04 – it STILL hasn’t happened – they can’t even decide on a new color scheme – that, to me, speaks volumes on the state of the development process at Ubuntu.

9.04 was very broken for me with my Intel graphics. I’m not getting into that, as it’s very well documented in other places on the web, but there was also something going on w/ brightness and power management. My screen would just randomly get brighter and then dimmer with no warning, and never would go full brightness. I then tried upgrading to the development branch of 9.10 as I heard that fixed many of the Intel issues, and I *thought* I had a stable distro/install and was pretty happy until for no apparent reason my machine just randomly started hard locking. I lived with it a few times, but after that, it was time to move on – and back to the first distro I tried, Fedora 11, which has been awesome. This whole thing disappointed me, as I was pumped up having an “all Intel” machine as I’d always heard that was the sure-fire way to ensure full Linux compatibility. The fact that Ubuntu would release, knowing all too well those Intel regressions were there, JUST to stay on time with their precious little 6mo release cycle is disheartening, and I think I’ll stick with Fedora from now on, as they are always more cutting edge, better with upstream and as leading edge as they are, they aren’t afraid to push a release back if something is broken!

So, there you have it – my brief run through some distro’s in the Summer of ‘09!

Written by jaysonrowe on August 9th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on fedora and otherSoftware and Ubuntu and Linux and Computing.

The Post-Monopoly Game

Walking out of cable TV’s walled garden. DOC SEARLS

Far as I know (that is, as far as some Motorola engineers have told me), my Dish Network and Verizon FiOS set-top boxes are Linux machines. So is my Sony flat-screen TV, which came complete with a four-page document explaining the GPL. Linux in each case is embedded. That is, it is enslaved to a single purpose or to a narrow set of purposes. This isn’t a big deal. Linux has become the default embedded operating system for all kinds of stuff. I just think TV would have a lot bigger future if we liberated the whole category from enslavement to Hollywood and its captive distributors. Until we do, the one-way-ness of TV remains a highway to hell. I’m getting a good look at that hell right now, sitting in an airport lounge in Boston. It’s still winter as I’m writing this. There are lots of canceled flights and, therefore, lots of relevant news on the lounge television, tuned, as always, to CNN. If this were two years ago, there would have been people gathered around that TV to see what’s up with the weather and the rest of the news. But, not today. Nobody is watching. The TV is just noise in the background. Of the 18 passengers waiting here, all but two are using laptops. I just did a quick walk-around and talked to a few of the laptoppers. All of them are using their laptops to keep up with weather and flight conditions. TV can’t compete with that. There are too many good sources of information on the Web now. More important, they’re all interactive. TV isn’t—not yet, anyway. As it happens, our family withdrew cold-turkey from TV this morning. We called Verizon and canceled our FiOS TV service. The set-top box, Linux innards and all, is now sitting in the hall, waiting to be ferried back to a Verizon office.
The reason was choice. Even at its best, TV didn’t give us much—not compared to the endless millions of choices on YouTube, Hulu and everybody else with video to share on the Web.

The free stuff—old-fashioned over-the-air (OTA) TV—is a mess. By the time you read this, most or all of the TV stations in the US will be transmitting digital audio and video, via ATSC. Old-fashioned analog NTSC, which has been with us since the 1940s, will be gone by the June 12 deadline. I’m not sure how much people will bother watching. All you get are a couple dozen channels, tops. On cable or satellite, you can get much more. I don’t think you can get a bigger selection than what Verizon FiOS offers. Where we live, FiOS carries 596 channels, including 108 HD channels and 136 premium channels, most of which are also HD. By the time I canceled the service on the phone this morning, the FiOS agent had reduced the price of the Extreme HD plan to $47.99/month, including free DVR settop box rental (normally $12.99/month). That plan has 358 channels, including all 108 HD channels. It’s a helluva deal, if you like a lot of TV. Making FiOS even better is that it comes over a fiber-optic connection that provides uncompromised data quality. But we still canceled it, because we’d rather not watch channels at all. We’d rather watch programs. Or movies. Or stuff that doesn’t fit either category. And, we’d prefer a better way to select them than by struggling with any of the cable or satellite systems’ “guides”, which are all terrible. It’s much easier to navigate file paths and to do it on a real computing device, including today’s smart phones (which are really data devices that also do telephony). Because there’s lots of video available on-line and from rental services like Netflix, we figure we’d take advantage of those. As it happens, Verizon makes it easy to get them in high-def, because we remain customers of FiOS high-speed Internet. There we get a solid 20Mbps both upstream and down, for $64.99. It’s an excellent deal, because that’s for the whole world, and not just for a few hundred “channels” behind the gate to a walled garden.

Now that we’ve walked out of cable TV’s walled garden, I can see how it traps the carriers even more than it traps the viewers. What they’re trapped in is a scarcity game. And, they’re losing. The producers and consumers are getting together without them. I can watch ACC sports on-line at the Raycom site. Nearly every channel on TV has a Web site that offers either live or archived content. True, all of them are pains in the butt to use (some requiring Flash plugins or worse), and many make half-hearted efforts to protect their cable and station distributors. But the writing is on the screen.

Now I’m thinking about what the abundance business would be like. What would you want out of the carriers if their Linux set-top boxes were open, or if you could provide your own? What game should they be playing once all they own is, say, the railroads and not the whole Monopoly board? Or hey, choose your own metaphor. Let’s help them out here. They’ll need it.

Source of Information : Linux Journal Issue 182 June.2009

Written by magakos on August 5th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on otherSoftware and Linux.

Say Goodbye to Reboots with Ksplice

Tired of rebooting for kernel updates?
Good news—now you don’t have to, thanks to Ksplice Uptrack.

Everyone hates rebooting for updates. When system administrators reboot their servers, they have to manage an inconvenient outage window—quite possibly during the middle of the night—and they have to deal with the lost productivity and annoyed users that result from the disruption. Similarly, rebooting your desktop means losing all of your valuable state—your favorite editor with the 35 open files you were working on, your 14 terminals, and, of course, your paused game of Frozen Bubble. But the alternative—not installing updates right away— is even more unpleasant. If your parents were anything like mine, they insisted that you do two things: eat your vegetables and install your software updates. Why? Well, first, vegetables provide your body with much-needed nutrients.

Second, most exploits take advantage of well-known software vulnerabilities—vulnerabilities that do not exist on patched systems. So staying up to date goes a long way in keeping your systems secure and reliable. So is this it? Will we forever be forced to choose between security and availability? Fortunately, the answer is no. Ksplice, a startup company founded by MIT alumni, has developed technology that can install software updates, without requiring a reboot. Using this technology, they are offering Ksplice Uptrack, a service that keeps your Linux systems up to date and secure without any hassle. Additionally, experienced kernel developers also can use the Ksplice tools to create their own rebootless updates.


Getting Started with Ksplice Uptrack
You can start using Ksplice Uptrack without any advance preparation. Follow the directions on the Ksplice Uptrack Web site, which allows you to install the software using your package manager. Once you’ve done this, a K icon appears in your notification area. When you see the K, you know that you have the latest security fixes for your Linux kernel. When new updates are available, a warning sign appears over the K.

When this happens, click on the K to view a list of the available updates. Install the updates by clicking the green Install all updates button. The listed updates will be installed on your running system in seconds, as your applications continue to run without interruption.

Like any good Linux tool, Ksplice Uptrack also can be controlled from the command line, with four simple commands. Each update has an ID associated with it, which you use to name it. You can install or remove individual updates, just like with any package manager. Here are the Ksplice Uptrack Commands:

- uptrack-upgrade: downloads and installs the latest kernel updates available for your system.

- uptrack-install id: installs the update named id.

- uptrack-remove id: removes the update named id.

- uptrack-show id: shows more detail about the update named id.

What about when you actually do reboot? Well, you can boot in to your brand-new kernel that you’ve installed the traditional way, using your package manager. Everything will continue to work nicely, and when Ksplice Uptrack detects new updates for this kernel, it will notify you, just like before.

Alternatively, you can reboot into your old kernel. In this case, Ksplice Uptrack will re apply the rebootless updates early in the boot process. This approach may be more desirable for some system administrators, because it ensures that the machine is in the exact same configuration both before and after the reboot.

Source of Information : Linux Journal Issue 184 August 2009

Written by magakos on July 27th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on otherSoftware and Linux.

Linux on Hyper-V! Microsoft Contributes Code to the Linux Kernel

Microsoft released 20,000 lines of device driver code to the Linux Community. If you enjoyed this post consider subscribing via or ...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]


Written by magakos on July 20th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on Hyper-V and otherSoftware and Linux.

« Older articles

Newer articles »