Too much Windows Vista cache, a bad ting?太多Windows Vista的快取记忆体，一个坏婷？ Well, apparently yes, through Excessive Cached Write I/O and Excessive Cached Read I/O.好，这显然是，通过过度缓存写I / O和过量存储读的I / O 。 As you probably know by now, cache is connected with boosting the performance of data accessing processes that target sluggish storage media.正如你可能知道，现在，快取记忆体，是与提高业绩的数据存取过程目标呆滞储存媒体。 In an ideal scenario, the data or the code pages would be completely located within the system memory.在一个理想的情况下，数据或代码页将完全位于内的系统记忆体。 The speed at which data is accessed, in the physical RAM, exceeds by far that of similar processes that involve a hard disk, by approximately 1 million times.速度上的数据被访问时，在物理内存，更远远超过说，类似的过程，涉及到硬盘上，由大约100万倍。 But, because of the usually limited amount of RAM, the operating system will have to deal with system cache.但是，由于通常是数量有限的RAM ，操作系统将不得不处理系统缓存。 (more…) （更多… … ）

algorithm算法 , ， hard disk硬盘 , ， memory manager记忆经理 , ， msdn MSDN上 , ， operating system操作系统 , ， physical memory物理内存 , ， physical ram物理内存 , ， processes流程 , ， storage media存储媒介 , ， system cache系统缓存 , ， system memory系统内存 , ， system performance系统性能 , ， vista Vista中 , ， Windows窗户

One of the core differences between 32-bit and 64-bit editions of其中一个核心的分歧，在32位和64位版本 Windows Vista Windows Vista中 is of course how much system memory the two variants of Microsoft’s latest operating systems can use.这当然是有多少系统内存在两种不同的微软最新的操作系统可以使用。 Users have to understand that Microsoft alone limited 32-bit Vista to a maximum of 4 GB of RAM while taking the high-end editions of 64-bit Vista up to 128 GB of RAM.使用者必须明白，只有微软一家有限的32位Vista中，以最多4 GB的RAM ，同时考虑了高端版本的64位Vista的高达128 GB的RAM 。 The fact of the matter is that Microsoft could have tailor fitted both 32-bit Windows Vista and Windows XP to address well in excess of 4 GB of system memory, but didn’t.其实，事情的是，微软可以度身订造安装32位Windows Vista和Windows XP ，以解决远超过4 GB的系统内存，但是却没有这样做。 The best argument related to the possibility of introducing support for over 4 GB of RAM with x86 Vista and最好的论据相关的可能性，引进支持超过4 GB的RAM还有X86 Vista和 XP XP中 is the fact that Microsoft does feature 32-bit Window operating systems that do it.事实是，微软是否特色的32位视窗操作系统这样做。 Case in point Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (32 GB of physical RAM), Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition and Windows Server 2003 SP1, Enterprise Edition(64 GB of physical RAM) and Windows Server 2003 SP1, Datacenter Edition (128 GB of physical RAM).例子，在Windows Server 2003的企业版（ 32 GB的物理内存） ， Windows Server 2003的数据中心版本和Windows Server 2003 SP1 ，企业版（ 64 GB的物理内存）和Windows Server 2003 SP1 ，数据中心版（ 128 GB的物理内存） 。 All these server side Windows operating systems are 32-bit platforms.所有这些服务器端的Windows操作系统的32位平台。

So why hasn’t the same been done with Windows那么，为什么有不一样做了与Windows Vista Vista中 ? ？ Well, just because the 32-bit server operating好，因为32位服务器操作系统

…