注: 最初にこの内容からの http://mygreenpaste.blogspot.com. 読書他の場所からのそれ、訪問するのに時間をかけなさい 私の緑ののり、株式会社. ありがとう。

わかりました、は従って多分無秩序僅かな乱暴な言葉ここにである。 しかしクリップボードは最近nuts私を運転していた! 私がすることを試みていたすべてはそれへテキストをコピーすることであり操作は失敗していた。 当然、それがアドホックなappだったので、私はエラー処理種類のエラー処理をを持たなかった。 appは1つのシステムでうまく動作したが、クリップボードにテキストをコピーするために別のシステム(仮想計算機)のappを動かすことは一貫して失敗に終わった。

最終的に、私は問題が起こるとき私のappはクリップボードにデータを置くが、私はまだ適当な回避策をのための見つけていないことをどんなプロセスが防いでいたか定められた。 それはクリップボードにテキストのコピーの行為として私のために重大、である条件より正確さの多くではない。

とにかく、P/Invokeを使用して System.Diagnostics、私はvmusrvc.exe -事実上のPC 「仮想計算機ユーザー」の整備する-に開いたクリップボードがあったことを分った。 タイムスタンプを使用してからの プロセスモニター「でき事の側面図を描くs

これは私が約書きたいと思うものではない。 しかし最近発見したものは私をそうさせる。 従って、私はこれがタイトルにもかかわらず多くの技術的な利点を持っていないことこれに実験をすることにしあなたの謝罪を頼む。

最後のポストの後、 ヴィスタでプロセスの優先順位を、自動的に名指しで置きなさい ()おそらくよりよい示されたかもしれない、私はポストが他のある場所に方法を作ったことを発見した。 These sites appear to pull content from all over the web, package it up as their own, and toss ads all over it. One is lucky if the site even references the original author or links back to the original location of the post. It’s frustrating, to say the least. I’m all for distribution of knowledge and the like, but that’s taking it too far. Maybe I shouldn’t feel this way, but I (like others) put brain sweat and time into the work I do, and it would be nice if the source of the information would at least be cited if they’re going to republish it without the author’s consent.

So I visited two of these sites (which I have

…

The other day I was playing around with the Image File Execution Options and Sysinternals’ Process Monitor, in Vista. I saw an interesting query take place. Using notepad.exe as an example, I saw a query for a key called “PerfOptions” in [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\notepad.exe] when I ran notepad. The result was NAME NOT FOUND, so I decided to rectify that. After adding a key named “PerfOptions”, I ran notepad again. In Process Monitor, I saw queries for four values:

• IoPriority
• PagePriority
• CpuPriorityClass
• WorkingSetLimitInKB

Because of recent explorations with process priorities*, CpuPriorityClass grabbed me right away. Looking at the SetPriorityClass function, one can see the different values for the dwPriorityClass parameter. I created a REG_DWORD named CpuPriorityClass in PerfOptions, and set the value to 0×80 in the hopes that notepad would launch with “HIGH_PRIORITY_CLASS”. Instead, it launched with a priority of NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS (8) - the setting had not made any impact. Then, I set the value to 8 and launched notepad. Notepad launched with a priority of 8. I changed the value to 4, and that had no impact. I changed the value to 0 - no impact. I tried 10 - no impact. I couldn’t see any

…

I’ve written about Sysinternals’ Process Monitor utility before:

• Microsoft / Sysinternals Process Monitor
• Using Process Monitor to Troubleshoot Internet Explorer 7 Performance Issues

I have had a few months now to work with Process Monitor, and it certainly is amazing. The filtering capabilities are great, and the fact that the filters are not destructive makes slicing and dicing the data many ways quite simple. The ability to capture all of the data that the utility can capture makes it quite powerful, and the ability to get stack traces for each event is extremely useful.

Going off the observation that Process Monitor is currently at version 1.01, and the assumption that the utility will see further development, I have hopes that the following relatively small ideas will be taken into consideration for future releases, and that further discussion and conversation is sparked.

1) Allow for the use of CTRL+C to copy selected data to the clipboard. Some data can be copied in this fashion, but from my experience not much. In many cases, one can right-click and choose “Copy” from the context menu, but that’s inconvenient. For example, on Event properties, on the Event…