這不是什麼我想要寫着。 但新發現強迫我如此做。 如此，我決定做這實驗，并且乞求您的道歉這不會有技術優點儘管標題。

在最後崗位以後， 自動地名義上設置過程的優先權，在景色 (可能大概被命名了很多更好)，我發現崗位做了它的方式對其他站點。 這些站點看上去在網拉扯內容從，包裝它作為他們自己，并且在它扔ads。 One is lucky if the site even references the original author or links back to the original location of the post. 它是令人沮喪，認為最少。 我是全部為知識的發行等等，但那太採取它。 Maybe I shouldn’t feel this way, but I (like others) put brain sweat and time into the work I do, and it would be nice if the source of the information would at least be cited if they’re going to republish it without the author’s consent.

如此我參觀了我有的二這些站點(

…

The other day I was playing around with the 圖像文件施行選擇 并且Sysinternals』 Process Monitor在景色。 我看一次有趣的詢問發生。 使用notepad.exe为例，我為稱「PerfOptions的」鑰匙看了詢問在[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \軟件\微軟\視窗NT \ CurrentVersion \圖像文件施行選擇\ notepad.exe]，當我跑了筆記薄。 結果是命名沒發現，因此我決定矯正那。 在增加名為「PerfOptions的」鑰匙以後，我再跑了筆記薄。 在處理顯示器，我為四價值看了詢問：

• IoPriority
• PagePriority
• CpuPriorityClass
• WorkingSetLimitInKB

Because of recent explorations with process priorities*, CpuPriorityClass grabbed me right away. Looking at the SetPriorityClass function, one can see the different values for the dwPriorityClass parameter. I created a REG_DWORD named CpuPriorityClass in PerfOptions, and set the value to 0×80 in the hopes that notepad would launch with “HIGH_PRIORITY_CLASS”. Instead, it launched with a priority of NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS (8) - the setting had not made any impact. Then, I set the value to 8 and launched notepad. Notepad launched with a priority of 8. I changed the value to 4, and that had no impact. I changed the value to 0 - no impact. I tried 10 - no impact. I couldn’t see any

…

I’ve written about Sysinternals’ Process Monitor utility before:

• Microsoft / Sysinternals Process Monitor
• Using Process Monitor to Troubleshoot Internet Explorer 7 Performance Issues

I have had a few months now to work with Process Monitor, and it certainly is amazing. The filtering capabilities are great, and the fact that the filters are not destructive makes slicing and dicing the data many ways quite simple. The ability to capture all of the data that the utility can capture makes it quite powerful, and the ability to get stack traces for each event is extremely useful.

Going off the observation that Process Monitor is currently at version 1.01, and the assumption that the utility will see further development, I have hopes that the following relatively small ideas will be taken into consideration for future releases, and that further discussion and conversation is sparked.

1) Allow for the use of CTRL+C to copy selected data to the clipboard. Some data can be copied in this fashion, but from my experience not much. In many cases, one can right-click and choose “Copy” from the context menu, but that’s inconvenient. For example, on Event properties, on the Event…