注： 原始這個內容從 http://mygreenpaste.blogspot.com. 如果您是讀書它從某一其他站點，請需要時間參觀 我的綠色漿糊，公司. 謝謝。

或許好，因此混亂這裡是一點苛刻的話。 但剪貼板最近駕駛我堅果! 我設法做的所有是複製一些文本對它，并且操作發生故障。 當然，因為它是特別app，我沒有任何种錯誤處理。 app在一個系統運作正義罰款，但跑app在另一個系統(一臺虛擬機)一貫地導致疏忽複製文本到剪貼板。

最後，我能確定什麼過程防止我的app投入數據在剪貼板，但我未發現一個正派解決方法為，當問題發生時。 它為我比要求不是重要的，作為複製文本行動對剪貼板是更多美好。

無論如何，使用P/Invoke和 System.Diagnostics我發現vmusrvc.exe -真正個人計算機「虛擬機用戶為服務」 -有剪貼板開放。 使用時間戳從 處理顯示器『描出事件的s

在發布頂部 窗口景色SP1 對寬廣的套上星期Beta測試員，也窗口服務器分部 釋放的發行候選人0 窗口服務器2008年。 我曾經為地方ISP工作幾歲月前并且處理了他們的跑窗口服務器的窗口服務器箱子2003年。 我在活躍目錄管理和IIS管理獲取了技能-，雖然非常基本。 我真正地想試驗在IIS7上的變化並且變動來對活躍目錄在窗口服務器2008年。 I decided to fire up Windows Server 2008 RC0 in Virtual PC 2007.

Windows Server 2008 in Virtual PC shows up on my home network as if it were an actual PC - with a real IP address and all.

I haven’t gotten around to testing Windows Server 2008 RC0 as a domain controller just yet. It currently sits on my home network serving as a web server (when fired up in Virtual PC). I used IIS7 to configure the server for “standard web hosting” - testing out using Microsoft Expression Web

…

On top of releasing Windows Vista SP1 to a broad set of beta testers last week, the Windows Server Division also released Release Candidate 0 of Windows Server 2008. I used to work for a local ISP a few years ago and managed their Windows Server boxes Read More……(read more)

• Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 Home
• Virtual PC 2007 Download (32 Bit and 64 Bit)
• Virtual PC Guy’s Weblog
• Using Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 for Application Compatibility (white paper)

Home

You know, there has been a lot of controversy lately (from developers I respect who should know better) about the news that Visual Studio .NET 2002/2005 will "mostly work but be unsupported" on Windows Vista. They claim that the answer "Just move your environment to Virtual PC and develop on VS.NET 2003 there" is unacceptable, claiming that virtualization is "slow, even on great hardware". Are the people complaining really going to be moving to Vista anyways? Or do they just like having stuff to complain about? Hmmm, I wonder…

First off, who is still developing on Windows XP in the first place? Most developers I know work on Windows Server 2003. It's faster, more responsive, and is more locked-down… plus you can develop and test on the same machine with IIS 6 built-in. You can say "well, my shop can't afford that many license of Windows Server", but every Microsoft shop should have at least one MSDN subscription. It's the single most cost-effective way to build testing environments.

But I digress. The bottom line is, if you're a develpment shop, and you're NOT using virtualization yet, you are wasting valuable time and money. How can I make such a bold and

…